Los Angeles Housing Investigation
Displaced
2026 · Vol. III
Chapter II · Data & Tables

Gentrification
doesn't happen
everywhere.

It happens in specific places, to specific people, under specific conditions. This chapter isolates those conditions — and the communities that felt them first.

The correlation the city did not want to see.

ACS 2000 & 2020
Census-tract matched
LA County · n = 198 tracts

Each dot below is one census tract in Los Angeles, plotted by its 20-year change in median rent (horizontal axis) and its 20-year change in the share of Latino residents (vertical axis). The pattern that emerges is not ambiguous: the tracts that saw the steepest rent increases also saw the steepest declines in Latino population share.

+30% +15% 0% −15% −30% 0% +50% +100% +150% +200% Δ LATINO POPULATION SHARE Δ MEDIAN RENT, 2000–2020 Echo Park Boyle Hts. Highland Pk. 198 CENSUS TRACTS · LOS ANGELES COUNTY · 2000–2020
Tracts with > 100% rent increase & Latino decline
All other LA County tracts

The neighborhoods that changed most, by composition.

U.S. Census
2000 vs. 2020
% of total population

Each row below is a Los Angeles neighborhood listed in descending order by the absolute magnitude of its demographic shift. Read them as companion figures to the rent data: the same neighborhoods appear, in the same order, for a reason.

Neighborhood 2000 Latino % 2020 Latino % 20-yr Δ 2000 White % 2020 White % 20-yr Δ
Echo Park63%38%−25 pts24%44%+20 pts
Highland Park72%52%−20 pts18%34%+16 pts
Boyle Heights94%78%−16 pts3%14%+11 pts
Elysian Valley81%66%−15 pts11%24%+13 pts
Leimert Park18%22%+4 pts3%12%+9 pts
West Adams52%41%−11 pts7%18%+11 pts
Koreatown57%52%−5 pts7%10%+3 pts
Mid-Wilshire42%36%−6 pts29%38%+9 pts
Brentwood9%10%+1 pt79%74%−5 pts
Pacific Palisades6%7%+1 pt83%78%−5 pts

Eviction filings, the mechanism of change.

Eviction Lab
LA County filings
Per 100 renter HH

Rent increases explain why people leave. Eviction filings explain how. The neighborhoods with the largest demographic shifts also sustained the highest eviction filing rates — a forced exit disguised as a market outcome.

Boyle Heights
8.4
South L.A.
7.9
Westlake / MacArthur Park
7.2
Highland Park
6.5
Koreatown
6.0
Echo Park
5.4
Leimert Park
5.0
Hollywood
3.8
Mid-Wilshire
2.4
Brentwood
0.8
Pacific Palisades
0.4

The synthesis: three signals, one pattern.

Compiled
Rent, Demo, Evictions
Ranked composite

The table below combines the three signals — rent change, demographic shift, and eviction filings — into a single ranked composite. Neighborhoods with the highest displacement pressure cluster at the top. The geographic pattern is not random; it is a corridor running through the historically Latino and Black working-class heart of the city.

# Neighborhood Rent Δ (20yr) Latino Δ (pts) Eviction rate Composite Index
01Echo Park+207%−255.494.2
02Highland Park+198%−206.591.8
03Boyle Heights+189%−168.489.4
04Elysian Valley+176%−154.881.2
05West Adams+112%−115.172.6
06Leimert Park+154%+45.068.9
07Koreatown+138%−56.064.1
08Mid-Wilshire+121%−62.452.3
09Hollywood+98%−43.844.7
10South L.A.+84%−27.941.9
11Brentwood+58%+10.812.4
12Pacific Palisades+49%+10.48.6

METHOD · The composite index rescales each of the three signals to a 0–100 range, inverts demographic change so that larger shifts score higher, and averages the three with equal weight. It is intended as an at-a-glance summary; the raw columns remain the primary evidence.


This pattern was built. It can be dismantled. But nothing will dismantle it by accident. — Closing note, Chapter II